| |
|
Trade marks - Litigation
|
|
Trade mark infringement: |
|
An owner, and in some instances a registered user, of a
registered trade mark may institute trade mark
infringement proceedings based on the following grounds: |
-
Where a person is making unauthorised use of an
identical mark, or a mark which so nearly represents
the registered mark, in the course of trade, in
relation to the same goods and/or services for which
the mark is registered, which is likely to deceive
or cause confusion.
-
Where a person is making unauthorised use of a mark,
which is the same or similar as a registered mark,
in the course of trade, in relation to goods or
services which are similar to the goods or services
covered by the registered mark, which is likely to
deceive or cause confusion.
-
Where a person is making unauthorised use of a
registered mark, or an essential part thereof, which
is well-known in South Africa, in a manner which is
likely to take unfair advantage of, or be
detrimental to the distinctive character, or repute
of the registered trade mark. The use in this
instance, may be in relation to any goods or
services, not only the goods or services covered by
the specification of the registered trade mark.
The Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993, as amended, furthermore
makes provision for infringement provisions relating to
the unauthorised use of an unregistered mark which is
well-known and used in relation to the goods or services
for which the mark is known.
|
Trade mark oppositions:
Once an application has been accepted for registration,
it will be advertised in the local Patent Journal for
possible opposition by third parties. Within 3 months of
advertisement, any interested person may oppose
registration of the mark advertised.
Grounds of opposition include the following: |
- The mark does not constitute a trade mark as
defined in the Trade Marks Act.
- The mark is not capable of distinguishing the
goods/services for which registration is sought from
the same goods/services of another trader in the
same sector.
- The mark consists solely of a sign or indication
which may serve in trade to designate the kind,
quality, quantity, intended purpose, value,
geographical origin, other characteristics and/or
method or time of production of the goods/service
for which registration is sought.
- The mark consists exclusively of a sign or
indication which has become customary in the current
language or in the bona fide established trade
practices of the trade.
- The applicant is not the bona fide proprietor of
the trade mark.
- The application was made with a lack of bona
fide intention to use the mark as a trade mark.
- The application was made mala fide or in bad
faith.
- The mark consists exclusively of a shape,
configuration, colour or pattern which is necessary
to obtain a technical result or results from the
nature of the goods themselves.
- The mark consists of a container of goods,
shape, configuration, colour or pattern of goods and
such registration is likely to limit development of
art or industry.
- The mark constitutes a reproduction, imitation
or translation of a mark or an essential part of a
mark which is well-known in terms of the Paris
Convention.
- The mark contains the state symbols including
the national flag of South Africa, symbols and
emblems of any convention country and/or certain
recognised international organisations.
- The mark contains a word, letter or device
indicating state patronage.
- The mark is a prohibited mark as provided for in
the Merchandise Marks Act 17 of 1941.
- The mark is inherently deceptive or use thereof
would be likely to deceive or cause confusion
amongst consumers.
- The mark is contrary to law, for example,
constitutes copyright infringement.
- The mark is contra boni mores / offends against
morality.
- The mark is likely to give offence to any class
of persons.
- The use of the mark is likely to deceive or
constitute confusion, as it is the same or similar
to a prior registered trade mark and covers the same
or similar goods/services as such prior
registration.
- The use of the mark is likely to deceive or
constitute confusion, as it is the same or similar
to a prior application and covers the same or
similar goods/services as such prior application.
- The mark which is subject of an earlier
application which is confusingly similar, if such
registration is contrary to the existing rights of
the person making the later application.
- The mark is the same or identical to a trade
mark which is already registered and well-known in
South Africa, if use of the mark sought to be
registered is likely to take unfair advantage of, be
detrimental to the distinctive character or the
repute of the registered trade mark, notwithstanding
the absence of deception or confusion.
|
|
It is possible to obtain an initial extension of 3
months of the opposition term to take instructions and
prepare evidence. Further extensions can only be
obtained with the consent of the applicant.
Trade mark expungement:
Any interested person may apply to the Registrar of
Trade Marks or the High Court of South Africa to
cancel/expunge a trade mark registration.
A registered trade mark may be removed on the following
grounds:
|
- Where the mark no longer constitutes a trade
mark as defined in the Trade Marks Act.
- Where a proprietor is in breach of a condition
of registration.
- If a mark has not been used for a continuous
period of 5 years or longer from the date of
registration.
- Where a trade mark has been registered in the
name of a company which has been dissolved and the
trade mark has not been assigned to another party
within 2 years from the dissolution.
- Where a trade mark has been registered in the
name of an individual and such individual died and
the trade mark has not been assigned to another
party within 2 years from such death.
|
Passing off and unlawful competition:
Passing off is a form of unlawful competition and occurs
when a person misrepresents that his products, services
or business are somehow associated or connected with the
goods, services or business of another.
Generally, to succeed on the basis of passing off
action, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: |
- A substantial amount of goodwill and/or
reputation vests in the name, mark or get-up in
question and that such goodwill or reputation is
associated with the plaintiff.
- The defendant has made a representation which is
likely to confuse members of the public and lead
them to believe that there is some connection
between the respective traders.
- Such deception or confusion is likely to cause
damages to the plaintiff's goodwill.
|
Need further advice?
The items above are not exhaustive and there are a
number of other conflict situations where trade mark
rights may be relied on. In this regard, for instance,
trade mark rights may also be relevant when considering
company and close corporation name objections,
counterfeit goods proceedings and domain name disputes.
You are welcome to contact us with instructions, if you
are currently facing a conflict or wish to prevent
someone from making unauthorised use of your trade mark. |
  
Tel no: +27 (0) 12 664 8960
Fax no: + 27 (0) 86 633 2977 or +27 (0) 12 644
2515
|
|